| Title |
Does the Direct Anterior Approach in THA Offer Faster Rehabilitation and Comparable Safety to the Posterior Approach?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3231-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José A. Rodriguez, Ajit J. Deshmukh, Parthiv A. Rathod, Michelle L. Greiz, Prashant P. Deshmane, Matthew S. Hepinstall, Amar S. Ranawat |
| Abstract |
Newer surgical approaches to THA, such as the direct anterior approach, may influence a patient's time to recovery, but it is important to make sure that these approaches do not compromise reconstructive safety or accuracy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 56 | 27% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 117 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 47 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,530,269
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#393
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,265
of 210,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.