| Title |
Objectively-Measured Free-Living Physical Activity and Heart Rate Recovery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10484-017-9359-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brittany R. Counts, Jeremy P. Loenneke, Paul D. Loprinzi |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to examine the association of free-living, objectively-measured physical activity on treadmill-based heart rate recovery (HRR), a parameter known to associate with morbidity and mortality. Data was used from 2003 to 2004 NHANES. Physical activity was assessed via accelerometry, with HRR recovery assessed from a treadmill-based test. Heart rate recovery minute 1 (HRR1) and minute 2 (HRR2) were calculated. After adjustment, light and vigorous-intensity free-living physical activity, respectively, were associated with HRR1 (βadjusted = 0.69, 95% CI 0.22-1.14; βadjusted 1.94, 95% CI 0.01-3.9) and HRR2 (βadjusted = 0.99, 95% CI 0.35-1.62; βadjusted = 5.88, 95% CI 2.63-9.12). Moderate physical activity was not associated with HRR1 (βadjusted = 0.60, 95% CI -0.41 to 1.62), but was with HRR2 (βadjusted = 2.28, 95% CI 1.27-3.28). As free-living physical activity intensity increased, there was a greater association with HRR. This finding may provide mechanistic insight of previous research observations demonstrating intensity-specific effects of physical activity on various health outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 42% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#16,069,695
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#243
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,109
of 310,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.