↓ Skip to main content

Trismus following different treatment modalities for head and neck cancer: a systematic review of subjective measures

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Trismus following different treatment modalities for head and neck cancer: a systematic review of subjective measures
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00405-017-4519-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sook Y. Loh, Robert W. J. Mcleod, Hassan A. Elhassan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Other 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 32 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2017.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#1,436
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,344
of 326,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#16
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.