↓ Skip to main content

The Profile of Serum microRNAs Predicts Prognosis for Resected Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Digestive Diseases and Sciences, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
The Profile of Serum microRNAs Predicts Prognosis for Resected Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Platinum-Based Chemotherapy
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10620-017-4513-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianning Song, Jie Yin, Zhigang Bai, Jun Zhang, Hua Meng, Jun Cai, Wei Deng, Xuemei Ma, Zhongtao Zhang

Abstract

Adjuvant chemotherapy is an important component in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC) patients; however, some patients do not respond to the drugs. We aimed to develop a practical profile based on serum microRNAs (miRNAs) that can be used to predict patients likely to respond to treatment. Microarrays were used to screen cisplatin-resistant SGC7901/DDP GC cells and the parental SGC7901 cell lines for miRNAs related to chemotherapy sensitivity. The correlation between the expression patterns of identified serum miRNAs and overall survival was confirmed in 68 GC patients. Furthermore, we also validated the signature of the serum miRNAs in an independent cohort of 50 GC patients. From the screening microarrays, we focused on miR-15a, miR-15b and miR-93 as downregulated miRNAs in the SGC7901/DDP cells and miR-27a, miR-106a and miR-664 as upregulated miRNAs. Only serum miR-106, miR-15a, miR-93 and miR-664 were useful in predicting the prognosis of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. We identified a signature of four serum miRNAs (miR-106, miR-15a, miR-93 and miR-664) that, when combined, can be used as a risk score for overall survival. Patients with a higher risk score had worse prognosis (p < 0.05). For the independent cohort of patients, the signature of the four miRNAs predicted prognosis well. Our data showed that the risk score derived from the four serum miRNAs was closely associated with the overall survival in GC patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2017.
All research outputs
#19,382,126
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#3,362
of 4,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,660
of 311,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Digestive Diseases and Sciences
#39
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.