↓ Skip to main content

The concomitants of conspiracy concerns

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 2,726)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
85 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
Title
The concomitants of conspiracy concerns
Published in
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00127-017-1354-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Freeman, Richard P. Bentall

Abstract

A conspiracy world view may be a form of mistrust that is typically corrosive to individual and societal well-being. Our aim was to establish the correlates of conspiracy thinking in an epidemiologically representative sample. US National Comorbidity Survey-Replication (NCS-R) data were analysed from 5645 people who had completed the item "I am convinced there is a conspiracy behind many things in the world." Results were weighted to be representative of the US adult English speaking household population. 1618 people (weighted 26.7%) endorsed the conspiracy belief item. These individuals were more likely to be: male; currently unmarried; less educated; in a lower income household; outside the labour force; from an ethnic minority group; not attending religious services; taking a weapon outside; and perceiving themselves as of lower social standing compared to others. Individuals endorsing the conspiracy belief item had lower levels of physical and psychological well-being, higher levels of suicidal ideation, weaker social networks, less secure attachment style, difficult childhood family experiences, and were more likely to meet criteria for a psychiatric disorder. There were no differences between those who endorsed conspiracy beliefs and those who did not in age, importance of religious beliefs in daily life, body mass index, or in having a gun at home. Viewing conspiracies in the world is associated with a raised risk of a wide range of adverse circumstances. It is a type of cognitive style that requires systematic empirical study, including monitoring of prevalence, tests of causation, and modelling of propagation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 252 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 14%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 79 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 80 32%
Social Sciences 29 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Unspecified 6 2%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 83 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 185. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#218,487
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#27
of 2,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,611
of 323,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
#2
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.