You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Crustal-scale recycling in caldera complexes and rift zones along the Yellowstone hotspot track: O and Hf isotopic evidence in diverse zircons from voluminous rhyolites of the Picabo volcanic field, Idaho
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.08.007 |
| Authors |
Dana L. Drew, Ilya N. Bindeman, Kathryn E. Watts, Axel K. Schmitt, Bin Fu, Michael McCurry |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 23% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 49 | 82% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2013.
All research outputs
#790,317
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#247
of 5,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,935
of 226,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.