| Title |
Line shapes in turbulent plasmas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal de Physique II, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1140/epjd/e2017-70737-2 |
| Authors |
Roland Stamm, Ibtissem Hannachi, Mutia Meireni, Hubert Capes, Laurence Godbert-Mouret, Mohammed Koubiti, Joël Rosato, Yannick Marandet, Milan Dimitrijević, Zoran Simić |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 67% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 67% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2017.
All research outputs
#860,484
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique II
#28
of 961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,689
of 322,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique II
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.