| Title |
The evolution of foliar terpene diversity in Myrtaceae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-013-9331-3 |
| Authors |
Amanda Padovan, András Keszei, Carsten Külheim, William J. Foley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Serbia | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 48% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2013.
All research outputs
#5,851,525
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#106
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,359
of 211,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them