↓ Skip to main content

Beyond the ‘back yard’: Lay knowledge about Aedes aegypti in northern Australia and its implications for policy and practice

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Tropica, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond the ‘back yard’: Lay knowledge about Aedes aegypti in northern Australia and its implications for policy and practice
Published in
Acta Tropica, June 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.05.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darlene McNaughton, Alan Clough, Petrina Johnson, Scott Ritchie, Scott O’Neill

Abstract

Controlling dengue fever in Australia and internationally, relies heavily upon the actions of residents as well as community education and awareness of the risks. Although it has been well established in medical anthropology that the success of health interventions is highly dependent upon a clear grasp of lay knowledge of disease, limited attention has been given to lay understandings of dengue fever and its vectors in the extant literature. We begin addressing this hiatus through an examination of north Queensland residents' knowledge of the breeding habitats of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Building on the insights of earlier social research, we use factor analysis to examine the results of a series of randomly selected telephone surveys and compare responses over time and between cities. Our analysis confirms that many people assume that Ae. aegypti is ubiquitous in the landscape, that it lives and breeds not only around the home, but also in a variety of geographical spaces located beyond the suburban 'backyard', and beyond the control of local residents. Lay understandings appear to be placing people at risk from dengue, influencing the mosquito management practices of local residents and acting as a source of resistance to public health messages that focus on individual responsibility. A way forward through the provision of new information that challenges key assumptions is provided in the discussion. We argue that rather than dismissing lay understandings as ignorance, strategies, practices and policy based on a detailed understanding of this knowledge will mean that practitioners are better able to address these assumptions and will likely be more effective at educating the public of the risks posed by dengue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 23%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 6 5%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 27 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,254,977
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta Tropica
#255
of 3,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,633
of 104,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Tropica
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.