Title |
Nutritional value of the kelps Alaria esculenta and Saccharina latissima and effects of short-term storage on biomass quality
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10811-017-1126-2 |
Authors |
Pierrick Stévant, Hélène Marfaing, Turid Rustad, Ingrid Sandbakken, Joël Fleurence, Annelise Chapman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 150 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 15% |
Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
Researcher | 20 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Unknown | 47 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 31% |
Environmental Science | 15 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 5% |
Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Other | 22 | 15% |
Unknown | 49 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2017.
All research outputs
#13,311,299
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#814
of 2,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,308
of 308,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#10
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,559 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.