↓ Skip to main content

Single track coincidence measurements of fluorescent and plastic nuclear track detectors in therapeutic carbon beams

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Instrumentation, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Single track coincidence measurements of fluorescent and plastic nuclear track detectors in therapeutic carbon beams
Published in
Journal of Instrumentation, April 2014
DOI 10.1088/1748-0221/9/04/p04013
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 29%
Researcher 4 29%
Professor 2 14%
Student > Master 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 6 43%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#9,850,307
of 32,950,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Instrumentation
#482
of 3,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,270
of 261,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Instrumentation
#5
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,950,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.