↓ Skip to main content

Explaining authors’ contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia’s knowledge base

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 240)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Explaining authors’ contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia’s knowledge base
Published in
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11412-013-9182-3
Authors

Iassen Halatchliyski, Johannes Moskaliuk, Joachim Kimmerle, Ulrike Cress

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Hong Kong 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 48 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Master 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 19 37%
Social Sciences 8 15%
Psychology 5 10%
Arts and Humanities 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,148,448
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
#17
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,470
of 209,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them