↓ Skip to main content

Rate of Adverse Effects of Medium- to High-Dose Glucocorticoid Therapy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Drug Investigation, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Rate of Adverse Effects of Medium- to High-Dose Glucocorticoid Therapy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40261-017-0518-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Savino Sciascia, Elisa Mompean, Massimo Radin, Dario Roccatello, Maria J. Cuadrado

Abstract

The efficacy of glucocorticoids (GCs) in treating systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is beyond doubt. However, GCs-related adverse effects (AEs) are multiple and serious. Despite the current available evidence suggesting to reduce daily doses of prednisone <7.5 mg/day, or even to withdraw it, in the real-life practice, it is not uncommon to see patients receiving medium doses (up to 30 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) or high doses (≥30 mg/day). We systematically reviewed the literature with a priori strategy, to assess the rate of AEs related to medium or high doses of GCs in patients with SLE, analyzing randomized control trials with at least one of the treatment groups including GCs alone at medium or high doses. We found a rate of 9/100 patients/year for hyperglycemias/diabetes, 25/100 patients/year for infections, and 12/100 patients/year for avascular necrosis of the hip. Interestingly, when adjusting for GC dose and treatment duration, we observed no difference in terms of AEs comparing patients receiving medium versus high doses. In the era when treat-to-target strategies have been proposed in order to control SLE disease activity, improved health-related quality of life, and reduced morbidity and mortality, using GCs in a more restrictive way should be a goal to prevent major complications in patients with SLE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 50%
Psychology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2017.
All research outputs
#13,792,234
of 23,509,253 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Drug Investigation
#655
of 983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,013
of 309,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Drug Investigation
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.