| Title |
Temporal genetic dynamics of reintroduced and translocated populations of the endangered golden lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-017-0948-4 |
| Authors |
Andreia Magro Moraes, Carlos R. Ruiz-Miranda, Milton Cezar Ribeiro, Adriana D. Grativol, Carolina da S. Carvalho, James M. Dietz, Maria Cecília M. Kierulff, Lucas A. Freitas, Pedro M. Galetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 20% |
| Denmark | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 14% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,202,789
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#182
of 1,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,629
of 314,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.