| Title |
Fine- and local- scale genetic structure of Dysoxylum malabaricum, a late-successional canopy tree species in disturbed forest patches in the Western Ghats, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-016-0877-7 |
| Authors |
Sofia Bodare, Gudasalamani Ravikanth, Sascha A. Ismail, Mohana Kumara Patel, Ilaria Spanu, Ramesh Vasudeva, Ramanan Uma Shaanker, Giovanni Giuseppe Vendramin, Martin Lascoux, Yoshiaki Tsuda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,451,618
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#849
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,132
of 344,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.