↓ Skip to main content

What skilled typists don’t know about the QWERTY keyboard

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 2,385)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
20 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
What skilled typists don’t know about the QWERTY keyboard
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, October 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13414-013-0548-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristy M. Snyder, Yuki Ashitaka, Hiroyuki Shimada, Jana E. Ulrich, Gordon D. Logan

Abstract

We conducted four experiments to investigate skilled typists' explicit knowledge of the locations of keys on the QWERTY keyboard, with three procedures: free recall (Exp. 1), cued recall (Exp. 2), and recognition (Exp. 3). We found that skilled typists' explicit knowledge of key locations is incomplete and inaccurate. The findings are consistent with theories of skilled performance and automaticity that associate implicit knowledge with skilled performance and explicit knowledge with novice performance. In Experiment 4, we investigated whether novice typists acquire more complete explicit knowledge of key locations when learning to touch-type. We had skilled QWERTY typists complete a Dvorak touch-typing tutorial. We then tested their explicit knowledge of the Dvorak and QWERTY key locations with the free recall task. We found no difference in explicit knowledge of the two keyboards, suggesting that typists know little about key locations on the keyboard, whether they are exposed to the keyboard for 2 h or 12 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Computer Science 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Design 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 135. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#313,603
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#11
of 2,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,354
of 223,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,385 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.