↓ Skip to main content

Meta-Analysis Identifies NF-κB as a Therapeutic Target in Renal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta-Analysis Identifies NF-κB as a Therapeutic Target in Renal Cancer
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0076746
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suraj Peri, Karthik Devarajan, Dong-Hua Yang, Alfred G. Knudson, Siddharth Balachandran

Abstract

To determine the expression patterns of NF-κB regulators and target genes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), their correlation with von Hippel Lindau (VHL) mutational status, and their association with survival outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Uruguay 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Computer Science 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,281,593
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#130,246
of 193,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,798
of 209,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,239
of 5,107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.