| Title |
Wearable technology to improve education and patient outcomes in a cardiology fellowship program - a feasibility study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Technology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12553-013-0065-4 |
| Authors |
S. Vallurupalli, H. Paydak, S. K. Agarwal, M. Agrawal, C. Assad-Kottner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 22% |
| Canada | 3 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 22 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 19% |
| Engineering | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,201,517
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Health and Technology
#16
of 263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,850
of 223,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Technology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.