| Title |
Important Plant Areas: revised selection criteria for a global approach to plant conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-017-1336-6 |
| Authors |
Iain Darbyshire, Seona Anderson, Anna Asatryan, Andrew Byfield, Martin Cheek, Colin Clubbe, Zeineb Ghrabi, Timothy Harris, Charlie D. Heatubun, James Kalema, Sékou Magassouba, Ben McCarthy, William Milliken, Bertrand de Montmollin, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Jean-Michel Onana, Doumbouya Saïdou, Anca Sârbu, Krishna Shrestha, Elizabeth A. Radford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 45% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| Germany | 3 | 9% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 82% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 50 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 39 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,611,610
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#210
of 2,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,512
of 324,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.