↓ Skip to main content

Food Allergy and Quality of Life: What Have We Learned?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Food Allergy and Quality of Life: What Have We Learned?
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11882-013-0391-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jantina L. van der Velde, Anthony E. J. Dubois, Bertine M. J. Flokstra-de Blok

Abstract

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) has become an emerging focus of interest in food allergy. Food allergy is a disease characterized by low mortality and symptoms which only occur during an allergic reaction. However, food-allergic patients continuously need to be alert when eating in order to prevent potentially severe allergic reactions, which may be fatal. Fear of such reactions and the need to be continuously vigilant may seriously compromise their HRQL. During the last decade, numerous studies have been published on food allergy and HRQL. The development of reliable, valid and responsive instruments for measuring HRQL in food allergic patients has facilitated this research even further. Such instruments have given insight into the specific problems a patient may face and the impact of food allergy-related interventions from the patient's perspective. This paper focuses on the most significant findings regarding this topic since its first appearance in the literature in 2000.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 35%
Psychology 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#294
of 872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,872
of 227,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.