| Title |
The Auckland calcium study: 5-year post-trial follow-up
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-013-2526-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. T. Radford, M. J. Bolland, B. Mason, A. Horne, G. D. Gamble, A. Grey, I. R. Reid |
| Abstract |
Five years after completion of a randomised placebo-controlled trial of calcium supplements, there was no effect of calcium on total fracture incidence, a significant reduction in vertebral and forearm fractures and, in a subset, no effect on bone density. There was no increased risk of cardiovascular events after discontinuation of calcium. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 20% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,349,805
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,716
of 3,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,255
of 209,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#24
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,635 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.