| Title |
The use of the Berlin definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome during infancy and early childhood: multicenter evaluation and expert consensus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-3110-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniele De Luca, Marco Piastra, Giovanna Chidini, Pierre Tissieres, Edoardo Calderini, Sandrine Essouri, Alberto Medina Villanueva, Ana Vivanco Allende, Marti Pons-Odena, Luis Perez-Baena, Michael Hermon, Ascanio Tridente, Giorgio Conti, Massimo Antonelli, Martin Kneyber, On behalf of Respiratory Section of the European Society for Pediatric Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) |
| Abstract |
A new acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) definition has been recently issued: the so-called Berlin definition (BD) has some characteristics that could make it suitable for pediatrics. The European Society for Pediatric Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) Respiratory Section started a project to evaluate BD validity in early childhood. A secondary aim was reaching a consensus on clinical tools (risk factors list and illustrative radiographs) to help the application of BD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Belgium | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 28% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 60% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2013.
All research outputs
#2,800,373
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,830
of 5,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,095
of 211,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.