↓ Skip to main content

Triggering social interactions: chimpanzees respond to imitation by a humanoid robot and request responses from it

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Triggering social interactions: chimpanzees respond to imitation by a humanoid robot and request responses from it
Published in
Animal Cognition, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10071-013-0689-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marina Davila-Ross, Johanna Hutchinson, Jamie L. Russell, Jennifer Schaeffer, Aude Billard, William D. Hopkins, Kim A. Bard

Abstract

Even the most rudimentary social cues may evoke affiliative responses in humans and promote social communication and cohesion. The present work tested whether such cues of an agent may also promote communicative interactions in a nonhuman primate species, by examining interaction-promoting behaviours in chimpanzees. Here, chimpanzees were tested during interactions with an interactive humanoid robot, which showed simple bodily movements and sent out calls. The results revealed that chimpanzees exhibited two types of interaction-promoting behaviours during relaxed or playful contexts. First, the chimpanzees showed prolonged active interest when they were imitated by the robot. Second, the subjects requested 'social' responses from the robot, i.e. by showing play invitations and offering toys or other objects. This study thus provides evidence that even rudimentary cues of a robotic agent may promote social interactions in chimpanzees, like in humans. Such simple and frequent social interactions most likely provided a foundation for sophisticated forms of affiliative communication to emerge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 2 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 62 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Computer Science 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2014.
All research outputs
#719,855
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#182
of 1,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,943
of 208,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#7
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.