You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shallow landsliding, root reinforcement, and the spatial distribution of trees in the Oregon Coast Range
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Geotechnical Journal, April 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1139/t02-113 |
| Authors |
Joshua J Roering, Kevin M Schmidt, Jonathan D Stock, William E Dietrich, David R Montgomery |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 19% |
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 76 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 14% |
| Engineering | 20 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,666,620
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Geotechnical Journal
#507
of 1,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,966
of 65,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Geotechnical Journal
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.