↓ Skip to main content

Androgen deprivation muscle attenuation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Androgen deprivation muscle attenuation
Published in
Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology, October 2013
DOI 10.1111/1754-9485.12124
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Chang, David J Joseph, Martin A Ebert, Daniel A Galvão, Dennis R Taaffe, James W Denham, Robert U Newton, Nigel A Spry

Abstract

Aging skeletal muscle is associated with not only a reduction in muscle size and strength but also in muscle quality which reflects an increase in fatty infiltration of muscle. In men with prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) accelerates this loss of muscle size and strength, but it is unknown if muscle quality is also adversely affected. Therefore, we examined the effects of ADT on muscle attenuation, an indirect measure of intramuscular lipid content, as well as the muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in men with prostate cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Sports and Recreations 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,278,325
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology
#498
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,273
of 222,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.