You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Androgen deprivation muscle attenuation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1111/1754-9485.12124 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Chang, David J Joseph, Martin A Ebert, Daniel A Galvão, Dennis R Taaffe, James W Denham, Robert U Newton, Nigel A Spry |
Abstract |
Aging skeletal muscle is associated with not only a reduction in muscle size and strength but also in muscle quality which reflects an increase in fatty infiltration of muscle. In men with prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) accelerates this loss of muscle size and strength, but it is unknown if muscle quality is also adversely affected. Therefore, we examined the effects of ADT on muscle attenuation, an indirect measure of intramuscular lipid content, as well as the muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in men with prostate cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 60% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 90 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 22% |
Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2020.
All research outputs
#14,278,325
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology
#498
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,273
of 222,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.