↓ Skip to main content

An Annulative Synthetic Strategy for Building Triphenylene Frameworks by Multiple C−H Bond Activations

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Annulative Synthetic Strategy for Building Triphenylene Frameworks by Multiple C−H Bond Activations
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/anie.201700405
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bijoy P. Mathew, Hyun Ji Yang, Joohee Kim, Jae Bin Lee, Yun‐Tae Kim, Sungmin Lee, Chang Young Lee, Wonyoung Choe, Kyungjae Myung, Jang‐Ung Park, Sung You Hong

Abstract

C-H activation is a versatile tool for appending aryl groups to aromatic systems. However, heavy demands on multiple catalytic cycle operations and site-selectivity have limited its use for graphene segment synthesis. A Pd-catal- yzed one-step synthesis of functionalized triphenylene frameworks is disclosed, which proceeds by 2- or 4-fold C-H arylation of unactivated benzene derivatives. A Pd2 (dibenzylideneacetone)3 catalytic system, using cyclic diaryliodonium salts as π-extending agents, leads to site-selective inter- and intramolecular tandem arylation sequences. Moreover, N-substituted triphenylenes are applied to a field-effect transistor sensor for rapid, sensitive, and reversible alcohol vapor detection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 22 73%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Materials Science 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2017.
All research outputs
#3,601,580
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#11,281
of 50,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,879
of 323,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#265
of 759 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 759 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.