↓ Skip to main content

A typology of design space explorers

Overview of attention for article published in AI EDAM, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A typology of design space explorers
Published in
AI EDAM, March 2006
DOI 10.1017/s0890060406060136
Authors

ROBERT F. WOODBURY, ANDREW L. BURROW

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 28 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 48%
Student > Master 6 19%
Researcher 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Design 12 39%
Computer Science 6 19%
Engineering 3 10%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from AI EDAM
#107
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,660
of 88,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AI EDAM
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.