↓ Skip to main content

Gender Identity Disparities in Bathroom Safety and Wellbeing among High School Students

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Gender Identity Disparities in Bathroom Safety and Wellbeing among High School Students
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10964-017-0652-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura J. Wernick, Alex Kulick, Matthew Chin

Abstract

By examining the relationship between trans identity, bathroom safety and wellbeing among high school students, this article empirically investigates how educational institutions operate as sites through which gender is negotiated in ways that are consequential for trans youth. We draw cross-sectional survey data, from a multi-school climate survey (n = 1046) conducted in the Midwestern United States, to examine three aspects of high school students' wellbeing: safety at school, self-esteem, and grades. The sample included students in 9th-12th grade who identified as trans (9.2%) and cisgender (41.2% boys, 49.6% girls), as well as LGBQ (21.6%) and heterosexual (78.4%). Most respondents were monoracial white (65.8%), monoracial Black (12.4%), and multiracial (14.1%). Using mediation and moderation linear regression models, we show that feeling safe using school facilities helps to explain widespread inequalities between trans and cisgender students. Based on these results, we suggest that in order to address disparities in educational outcomes between trans and cisgender students, as well as to improve student wellbeing in general, policies and practices need to ensure that all students have the right to safely access bathrooms and school facilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 45 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 23%
Social Sciences 30 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 52 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#508,578
of 24,751,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#80
of 1,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,817
of 313,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,751,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.