↓ Skip to main content

A multi-core parallelization strategy for statistical significance testing in learning classifier systems

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Intelligence, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
A multi-core parallelization strategy for statistical significance testing in learning classifier systems
Published in
Evolutionary Intelligence, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12065-013-0092-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Rudd, Jason H. Moore, Ryan J. Urbanowicz

Abstract

Permutation-based statistics for evaluating the significance of class prediction, predictive attributes, and patterns of association have only appeared within the learning classifier system (LCS) literature since 2012. While still not widely utilized by the LCS research community, formal evaluations of test statistic confidence are imperative to large and complex real world applications such as genetic epidemiology where it is standard practice to quantify the likelihood that a seemingly meaningful statistic could have been obtained purely by chance. LCS algorithms are relatively computationally expensive on their own. The compounding requirements for generating permutation-based statistics may be a limiting factor for some researchers interested in applying LCS algorithms to real world problems. Technology has made LCS parallelization strategies more accessible and thus more popular in recent years. In the present study we examine the benefits of externally parallelizing a series of independent LCS runs such that permutation testing with cross validation becomes more feasible to complete on a single multi-core workstation. We test our python implementation of this strategy in the context of a simulated complex genetic epidemiological data mining problem. Our evaluations indicate that as long as the number of concurrent processes does not exceed the number of CPU cores, the speedup achieved is approximately linear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 33%
Engineering 2 17%
Mathematics 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2013.
All research outputs
#3,271,259
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Intelligence
#4
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,435
of 209,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Intelligence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 45 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them