You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aai9214 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gretta T Pecl, Miguel B Araújo, Johann D Bell, Julia Blanchard, Timothy C Bonebrake, I-Ching Chen, Timothy D Clark, Robert K Colwell, Finn Danielsen, Birgitta Evengård, Lorena Falconi, Simon Ferrier, Stewart Frusher, Raquel A Garcia, Roger B Griffis, Alistair J Hobday, Charlene Janion-Scheepers, Marta A Jarzyna, Sarah Jennings, Jonathan Lenoir, Hlif I Linnetved, Victoria Y Martin, Phillipa C McCormack, Jan McDonald, Nicola J Mitchell, Tero Mustonen, John M Pandolfi, Nathalie Pettorelli, Ekaterina Popova, Sharon A Robinson, Brett R Scheffers, Justine D Shaw, Cascade J B Sorte, Jan M Strugnell, Jennifer M Sunday, Mao-Ning Tuanmu, Adriana Vergés, Cecilia Villanueva, Thomas Wernberg, Erik Wapstra, Stephen E Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,444 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 222 | 15% |
| Australia | 153 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 112 | 8% |
| Canada | 56 | 4% |
| Spain | 39 | 3% |
| France | 27 | 2% |
| Germany | 18 | 1% |
| South Africa | 17 | 1% |
| Finland | 16 | 1% |
| Other | 229 | 16% |
| Unknown | 555 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 969 | 67% |
| Scientists | 413 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 47 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Finland | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | <1% |
| Unknown | 4291 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 727 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 656 | 15% |
| Researcher | 654 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 486 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 175 | 4% |
| Other | 662 | 15% |
| Unknown | 983 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1240 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 1033 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 174 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 124 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 112 | 3% |
| Other | 450 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1210 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1768. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,913
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Science
#323
of 83,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80
of 325,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#8
of 1,195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.