↓ Skip to main content

Ivabradine: potential clinical applications in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Ivabradine: potential clinical applications in critically ill patients
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00392-012-0516-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincenzo De Santis, Domenico Vitale, Anna Santoro, Aurora Magliocca, Andrea Giuseppe Porto, Cecilia Nencini, Luigi Tritapepe

Abstract

It has been extensively demonstrated that an elevated heart rate is a modifiable, independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. A high heart rate increases myocardial oxygen consumption and reduces diastolic perfusion time. It can also increase ventricular diastolic pressures and induce ventricular arrhythmias. Critical care patients are prone to develop a stress induced cardiac impairment and consequently an increase in sympathetic tone. This in turn increases heart rate. In this setting, however, heart rate lowering might be difficult because the effects of inotropic drugs could be hindered by heart rate reducing drugs like beta-blockers. Ivabradine is a new selective antagonist of funny channels. It lowers heart rate, reducing the diastolic depolarization slope. Moreover, ivabradine is not active on sympathetic pathways, thus avoiding any interference with inotropic amines. We reviewed the literature available regarding heart rate control in critical care patients, focusing our interest on the use of ivabradine to assess the potential benefits of the drug in this particular setting.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 4 14%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 4 14%