↓ Skip to main content

Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
1305 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument.
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 1997
DOI 10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.974
Pubmed ID
Authors

M J Brady, D F Cella, F Mo, A E Bonomi, D S Tulsky, S R Lloyd, S Deasy, M Cobleigh, G Shiomoto

Abstract

This is the first published report on the validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), a 44-item self-report instrument designed to measure multidimensional quality of life (QL) in patients with breast cancer. The FACT-B consists of the FACT-General (FACT-G) plus the Breast Cancer Subscale (BCS), which complements the general scale with items specific to QL in breast cancer. The FACT-B was developed with an emphasis on patients' values and brevity and is available in nine languages. Two validation samples were used for this report. The first (n = 47) was tested twice over a 2-month period to assess sensitivity to change. Significant sensitivity to change in performance status rating (PSR) was demonstrated for the FACT-B total score, the Physical Well-Being (PWB) subscale, the Functional Well-Being (FWB) subscale, and the BCS. Sensitivity to change in QL as measured by the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC) was documented in the FACT-B total score, PWB, FWB, and Emotional Well-Being (EWB). Additional validity and reliability data were obtained from a larger sample (n = 295). The alpha coefficient (internal consistency) for the FACT-B total score was high (alpha = .90), with subscale alpha coefficients ranging from .63 to .86. Evidence supported test-retest reliability, as well as convergent, divergent, and known groups validity. The FACT-B is appropriate for use in oncology clinical trials, as well as in clinical practice. It demonstrates ease of administration, brevity, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 382 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 14%
Researcher 52 13%
Student > Bachelor 52 13%
Student > Master 45 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 7%
Other 69 17%
Unknown 94 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 14%
Psychology 53 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Sports and Recreations 14 4%
Other 53 13%
Unknown 119 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,474,130
of 23,868,111 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#7,196
of 20,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,126
of 30,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#7
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,111 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.