↓ Skip to main content

Low genetic diversity in the bottlenecked population of endangered non‐native banteng in northern Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Ecology, June 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low genetic diversity in the bottlenecked population of endangered non‐native banteng in northern Australia
Published in
Molecular Ecology, June 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03365.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

COREY J. A. BRADSHAW, YUJI ISAGI, SHINGO KANEKO, BARRY W. BROOK, DAVID M. J. S. BOWMAN, RICHARD FRANKHAM

Abstract

Undomesticated (wild) banteng are endangered in their native habitats in Southeast Asia. A potential conservation resource for the species is a large, wild population in Garig Gunak Barlu National Park in northern Australia, descended from 20 individuals that were released from a failed British outpost in 1849. Because of the founding bottleneck, we determined the level of genetic diversity in four subpopulations in the national park using 12 microsatellite loci, and compared this to the genetic diversity of domesticated Asian Bali cattle, wild banteng and other cattle species. We also compared the loss of genetic diversity using plausible genetic data coupled to a stochastic Leslie matrix model constructed from existing demographic data. The 53 Australian banteng sampled had average microsatellite heterozygosity (HE) of 28% compared to 67% for outbred Bos taurus and domesticated Bos javanicus populations. The Australian banteng inbreeding coefficient (F) of 0.58 is high compared to other endangered artiodactyl populations. The 95% confidence bounds for measured heterozygosity overlapped with those predicted from our stochastic Leslie matrix population model. Collectively, these results show that Australian banteng have suffered a loss of genetic diversity and are highly inbred because of the initial population bottleneck and subsequent small population sizes. We conclude that the Australian population is an important hedge against the complete loss of wild banteng, and it can augment threatened populations of banteng in their native range. This study indicates the genetic value of small populations of endangered artiodactyls established ex situ.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 102 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Master 10 9%
Professor 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 54%
Environmental Science 22 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 17 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2011.
All research outputs
#4,423,910
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Ecology
#2,382
of 6,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,544
of 68,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Ecology
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.