| Title |
Hydrogen production by the thermophilic bacterium Thermotoga neapolitana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, January 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1385/abab:98-100:1-9:177 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suellen A. Van Ooteghem, Stephen K. Beer, Paul C. Yue |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,475,123
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#35
of 2,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,742
of 130,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.