| Title |
Biology of the mechanosensory lateral line in fishes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, December 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01103813 |
| Authors |
John Montgomery, Sheryl Coombs, Matthew Halstead |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Professor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 55% |
| Engineering | 18 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,008,800
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#103
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,649
of 81,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them