| Title |
Reingestion of feces in rodents and its daily rhythmicity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, January 1979
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00545245 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. J. Kenagy, Donald F. Hoyt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,259,589
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#619
of 4,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#772
of 26,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.