| Title |
Preparation and property assessment of neat lignocellulose nanofibrils (LCNF) and their composite films
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cellulose, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10570-017-1266-1 |
| Authors |
Thomas Horseman, Mehdi Tajvidi, Cherif I. K. Diop, Douglas J. Gardner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 25% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 16 | 22% |
| Chemical Engineering | 13 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,452,475
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellulose
#709
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,140
of 308,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellulose
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.