↓ Skip to main content

The Epidemiology of Sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
15 X users
patent
53 patents
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
5087 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2331 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Epidemiology of Sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2003
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa022139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greg S. Martin, David M. Mannino, Stephanie Eaton, Marc Moss

Abstract

Sepsis represents a substantial health care burden, and there is limited epidemiologic information about the demography of sepsis or about the temporal changes in its incidence and outcome. We investigated the epidemiology of sepsis in the United States, with specific examination of race and sex, causative organisms, the disposition of patients, and the incidence and outcome. We analyzed the occurrence of sepsis from 1979 through 2000 using a nationally representative sample of all nonfederal acute care hospitals in the United States. Data on new cases were obtained from hospital discharge records coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification. Review of discharge data on approximately 750 million hospitalizations in the United States over the 22-year period identified 10,319,418 cases of sepsis. Sepsis was more common among men than among women (mean annual relative risk, 1.28 [95 percent confidence interval, 1.24 to 1.32]) and among nonwhite persons than among white persons (mean annual relative risk, 1.90 [95 percent confidence interval, 1.81 to 2.00]). Between 1979 and 2000, there was an annualized increase in the incidence of sepsis of 8.7 percent, from about 164,000 cases (82.7 per 100,000 population) to nearly 660,000 cases (240.4 per 100,000 population). The rate of sepsis due to fungal organisms increased by 207 percent, with gram-positive bacteria becoming the predominant pathogens after 1987. The total in-hospital mortality rate fell from 27.8 percent during the period from 1979 through 1984 to 17.9 percent during the period from 1995 through 2000, yet the total number of deaths continued to increase. Mortality was highest among black men. Organ failure contributed cumulatively to mortality, with temporal improvements in survival among patients with fewer than three failing organs. The average length of the hospital stay decreased, and the rate of discharge to nonacute care medical facilities increased. The incidence of sepsis and the number of sepsis-related deaths are increasing, although the overall mortality rate among patients with sepsis is declining. There are also disparities among races and between men and women in the incidence of sepsis. Gram-positive bacteria and fungal organisms are increasingly common causes of sepsis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 24 1%
Brazil 13 <1%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Spain 7 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Colombia 5 <1%
Denmark 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Other 26 1%
Unknown 2232 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 331 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 290 12%
Student > Master 251 11%
Student > Bachelor 224 10%
Student > Postgraduate 221 9%
Other 566 24%
Unknown 448 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1100 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 216 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 106 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 84 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 2%
Other 273 12%
Unknown 499 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#229,025
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#4,201
of 32,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174
of 62,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#9
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.