↓ Skip to main content

Current challenges in the management of sepsis in ICUs in resource-poor settings and suggestions for the future

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
Title
Current challenges in the management of sepsis in ICUs in resource-poor settings and suggestions for the future
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00134-017-4750-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus J. Schultz, Martin W. Dunser, Arjen M. Dondorp, Neill K. J. Adhikari, Shivakumar Iyer, Arthur Kwizera, Yoel Lubell, Alfred Papali, Luigi Pisani, Beth D. Riviello, Derek C. Angus, Luciano C. Azevedo, Tim Baker, Janet V. Diaz, Emir Festic, Rashan Haniffa, Randeep Jawa, Shevin T. Jacob, Niranjan Kissoon, Rakesh Lodha, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Ganbold Lundeg, David Misango, Mervyn Mer, Sanjib Mohanty, Srinivas Murthy, Ndidiamaka Musa, Jane Nakibuuka, Ary Serpa Neto, Mai Nguyen Thi Hoang, Binh Nguyen Thien, Rajyabardhan Pattnaik, Jason Phua, Jacobus Preller, Pedro Povoa, Suchitra Ranjit, Daniel Talmor, Jonarthan Thevanayagam, C. Louise Thwaites

Abstract

Sepsis is a major reason for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, also in resource-poor settings. ICUs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face many challenges that could affect patient outcome. To describe differences between resource-poor and resource-rich settings regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, economics and research aspects of sepsis. We restricted this manuscript to the ICU setting even knowing that many sepsis patients in LMICs are treated outside an ICU. Although many bacterial pathogens causing sepsis in LMICs are similar to those in high-income countries, resistance patterns to antimicrobial drugs can be very different; in addition, causes of sepsis in LMICs often include tropical diseases in which direct damaging effects of pathogens and their products can sometimes be more important than the response of the host. There are substantial and persisting differences in ICU capacities around the world; not surprisingly the lowest capacities are found in LMICs, but with important heterogeneity within individual LMICs. Although many aspects of sepsis management developed in rich countries are applicable in LMICs, implementation requires strong consideration of cost implications and the important differences in resources. Addressing both disease-specific and setting-specific factors is important to improve performance of ICUs in LMICs. Although critical care for severe sepsis is likely cost-effective in LMIC setting, more detailed evaluation at both at a macro- and micro-economy level is necessary. Sepsis management in resource-limited settings is a largely unexplored frontier with important opportunities for research, training, and other initiatives for improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 327 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 14%
Researcher 40 12%
Other 31 9%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Postgraduate 29 9%
Other 86 26%
Unknown 65 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 160 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 79 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,648,767
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,417
of 5,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,256
of 327,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#41
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.