| Title |
Fluid balance and weaning outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-005-2801-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anupama Upadya, Lisa Tilluckdharry, Visvanathan Muralidharan, Yaw Amoateng-Adjepong, Constantine A. Manthous |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 24% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,277,460
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,810
of 5,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,222
of 59,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.