↓ Skip to main content

Time of non-invasive ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Time of non-invasive ventilation
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00134-005-0050-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Nava, Paolo Navalesi, Giorgio Conti

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 165 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 24 14%
Researcher 22 13%
Other 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 47 27%
Unknown 35 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Engineering 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 37 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,862
of 5,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,474
of 157,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.