| Title |
Bench studies evaluating devices for non-invasive ventilation: critical analysis and future perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-011-2416-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlo Olivieri, Roberta Costa, Giorgio Conti, Paolo Navalesi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Professor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 20 | 23% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 59% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,852,360
of 23,383,275 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,335
of 5,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,925
of 243,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,383,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.