↓ Skip to main content

Mask mechanics and leak dynamics during noninvasive pressure support ventilation: a bench study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Mask mechanics and leak dynamics during noninvasive pressure support ventilation: a bench study
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2001
DOI 10.1007/s00134-001-1146-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guilherme Schettino, Mauro Tucci, Rogério Sousa, Carmen Barbas, Marcelo Amato, Carlos Carvalho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 13%
Other 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Professor 7 10%
Other 20 28%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,524,294
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,862
of 5,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,610
of 50,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.