| Title |
Initial experience of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung nodules using C-arm cone-beam CT systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-010-1783-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kwang Nam Jin, Chang Min Park, Jin Mo Goo, Hyun Ju Lee, Youkyung Lee, Jung Im Kim, So Young Choi, Hyo-Cheol Kim |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 24% |
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 67% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,740,361
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#622
of 4,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,378
of 95,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.