↓ Skip to main content

Image-guided percutaneous drainage of thoracic empyema: Can sonography predict the outcome?

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, February 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Image-guided percutaneous drainage of thoracic empyema: Can sonography predict the outcome?
Published in
European Radiology, February 2000
DOI 10.1007/s003300050083
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Shankar, M. Gulati, M. Kang, S. Gupta, S. Suri

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 68%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2005.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#1,360
of 4,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,717
of 111,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.