Title |
Measuring daily fatigue using a brief scale adapted from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Quality of Life Research, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11136-013-0553-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher Christodoulou, Stefan Schneider, Doerte U. Junghaenel, Joan E. Broderick, Arthur A. Stone |
Abstract |
Daily assessments can provide insight into the temporal characteristics of fatigue. They can demonstrate consistency or reveal variability, as when fatigue changes with the underlying medical condition, improves with therapy, or worsens as a medication side effect. We adapted a fatigue measure from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) for daily assessment and examined its psychometric properties in a month-long prospective study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 73 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
Researcher | 11 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 28% |
Psychology | 12 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
Mathematics | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 18 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,242,711
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#792
of 2,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,981
of 212,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#9
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,851 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.