↓ Skip to main content

Molecular docking of thiamine reveals similarity in binding properties between the prion protein and other thiamine-binding proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Modeling, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Molecular docking of thiamine reveals similarity in binding properties between the prion protein and other thiamine-binding proteins
Published in
Journal of Molecular Modeling, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00894-013-1979-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nataraj S. Pagadala, Trent C. Bjorndahl, Nikolay Blinov, Andriy Kovalenko, David S. Wishart

Abstract

Prion-induced diseases are a global health concern. The lack of effective therapy and 100% mortality rates for such diseases have made the prion protein an important target for drug discovery. Previous NMR experimental work revealed that thiamine and its derivatives bind the prion protein in a pocket near the N-terminal loop of helix 1, and conserved intermolecular interactions were noted between thiamine and other thiamine-binding proteins. Furthermore, water-mediated interactions were observed in all of the X-ray crystallographic structures of thiamine-binding proteins, but were not observed in the thiamine-prion NMR study. To better understand the potential role of water in thiamine-prion binding, a docking study was employed using structural X-ray solvent. Before energy minimization, docked thiamine assumed a "V" shape similar to some of the known thiamine-dependent proteins. Following minimization with NMR-derived restraints, the "F" conformation was observed. Our findings confirmed that water is involved in ligand stabilization and phosphate group interaction. The resulting refined structure of thiamine bound to the prion protein allowed the 4-aminopyrimidine ring of thiamine to π-stack with Tyr150, and facilitated hydrogen bonding between Asp147 and the amino group of 4-aminopyrimidine. Investigation of the π-stacking interaction through mutation of the tyrosine residue further revealed its importance in ligand placement. The resulting refined structure is in good agreement with previous experimental restraints, and is consistent with the pharmacophore model of thiamine-binding proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2015.
All research outputs
#19,635,340
of 25,002,811 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#554
of 885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,790
of 217,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,002,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 885 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.