| Title |
Renal sympathetic denervation therapy in the real world: results from the Heidelberg registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Research in Cardiology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00392-013-0627-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Britta Vogel, Michael Kirchberger, Martin Zeier, Felicitas Stoll, Benjamin Meder, Daniel Saure, Martin Andrassy, Oliver J. Mueller, Stefan Hardt, Vedat Schwenger, Anna Strothmeyer, Hugo A. Katus, Erwin Blessing |
| Abstract |
Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is a novel treatment option in patients with treatment-resistant arterial hypertension. A subset of recently published randomized and non-randomized trials indicates that RDN leads to sustained lowering of blood pressure (BP) under controlled study conditions. However, registry data that allow evaluation of safety and efficacy in a real-world setting are largely missing. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 20% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 69% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2013.
All research outputs
#13,698,262
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#448
of 807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,820
of 210,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.