↓ Skip to main content

Localised intraspecific variation in the swimming phenotype of a coral reef fish across different wave exposures

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Localised intraspecific variation in the swimming phenotype of a coral reef fish across different wave exposures
Published in
Oecologia, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2794-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra A. Binning, Dominique G. Roche, Christopher J. Fulton

Abstract

Wave-driven water flow is a major force structuring marine communities. Species distributions are partly determined by the ability to cope with variation in water flow, such as differences in the assemblage of fish species found in a given water flow environment being linked to swimming ability (based on fin shape and mode of locomotion). It remains unclear, however, whether similar assembly rules apply within a species. Here we show phenotypic variation among sites in traits functionally linked to swimming ability in the damselfish Acanthochromis polyacanthus. These sites differ in wave energy and the observed patterns of phenotypic differences within A. polyacanthus closely mirrored those seen at the interspecific level. Fish from high-exposure sites had more tapered fins and higher maximum metabolic rates than conspecifics from sheltered sites. This translates to a 36% larger aerobic scope and 33% faster critical swimming speed for fish from exposed sites. Our results suggest that functional relationships among swimming phenotypes and water flow not only structure species assemblages, but can also shape patterns of phenotypic divergence within species. Close links between locomotor phenotype and local water flow conditions appear to be important for species distributions as well as phenotypic divergence across environmental gradients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 75 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 5 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 63%
Environmental Science 15 19%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#5,855,715
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,224
of 4,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,291
of 211,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#7
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.