↓ Skip to main content

Current therapeutic strategies for childhood hepatic tumors: surgical and interventional treatments for hepatoblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Current therapeutic strategies for childhood hepatic tumors: surgical and interventional treatments for hepatoblastoma
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10147-013-0625-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomoro Hishiki

Abstract

Surgery is the mainstay of multimodal treatment for hepatoblastomas. Among the various staging systems used, PRETEXT is currently adopted in all major study groups worldwide as a common pretreatment staging system. Although variations of treatment strategies among study groups exist, the majority of hepatoblastoma cases currently undergo preoperative chemotherapy. It is therefore critical to determine the optimal surgical treatment during the initial courses of chemotherapy. Patients with PRETEXT IV tumors, multifocal tumors and tumors invading major vessels of the liver are candidates for liver transplantation. Liver transplantation requires preparation in advance, and consultation to a liver expertise team must take place no later than after two cycles of chemotherapy. The existence of pulmonary metastasis is a predictor of poor prognosis of the patient. Surgery for pulmonary nodules should be considered for those patients remaining positive after cycles of chemotherapy. A considerable number of patients have been reported to achieve long-term survival after resecting pulmonary metastasis. The existence of pulmonary metastasis at diagnosis is no longer a contraindication for liver transplantation, provided that the pulmonary nodules are eliminated by chemotherapy or by metastasectomy. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a useful tool for the local control of hepatoblastomas, although there are very few reports statistically supporting the significant advantage of this treatment modality. Based on individual cases, TACE could be beneficial in maximizing the anti-tumor effect with less toxic side effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,207,295
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#611
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,193
of 211,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.